Keywords
social relationships
leisure
entertainment
students
How to Cite
Abstract
The research explored transdisciplinarily how high school students in the capital of Mexico see artificial intelligence (AI) in their social interrelation dynamics, leisure activities and entertainment. A descriptive quantitative methodology was used, with a sample of students from the public and private sectors; an ad hoc Likert scale instrument was used (reliability coefficient of 0.77). The main findings indicated that students: consider that AI does not necessarily have to dehumanize interpersonal interaction, and they do not know if this technology favors the creation of new human ties; they like to use AI to entertain themselves and have moments of leisure by generating content with it, but they do not use it to disseminate information. It is concluded that AI has the capacity to generate new forms of transdisciplinary dialogicity in social and cultural interactions that help give a disruptive sense of identity.
References
Alam, A., Hasan, M., & Raza, M. (2022). Impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on education: Changing paradigms and approaches. Towards Excellence, 14(1). https://hrdc.gujaratuniversity.ac.in/Publication/article?id=4896
André, E. (2021, October 18). Socially Interactive Artificial Intelligence: Past, Present and Future. International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces. https://doi.org/10.1145/3462244.3480862
Batthyány, K., Cabrera, M., Alesina, L., Bertoni, M., Mascheroni, P., Moreira, N., Picasso, F., Ramírez, J., y Rojo, V. (2011). Metodología de la investigación para las ciencias sociales: apuntes para un curso inicial. Universidad de la República. https://repositorio.minedu.gob.pe/handle/20.500.12799/4544
Cárdenas, J. (2018). Investigación cuantitativa. trAndeS. http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-216
Chauca García, J. (2022). Social Behaviour and Artificial Intelligence: The Myth of Sisyphus in Question. En J. Saura & F. Debasa (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Artificial Intelligence in Government Practices and Processes (pp. 55-65). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9609-8.ch004
Cho, E., & Kim, S. (2015). Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha. Organizational Research Methods, 18(2), 207 - 230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114555994
Global (9 de septiembre de 2019). Por qué ‘estadísticamente significativo’ no debería ser un sello de aprobación científica. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. https://unamglobal.unam.mx/global_revista/por-que-estadisticamente-significativo-no-deberia-ser-un-sello-de-aprobacion-cientifica/
Lai, T., Xie, C., Ruan, M., Wang, Z., Lu, H., & Fu, S. (2023). Influence of artificial intelligence in education on adolescents’ social adaptability: The mediatory role of social support. PLOS ONE, 18(3), e0283170. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283170
Malinetsky, G. G., & Smolin, V. S. (2021). The artificial intelligence influence on real sociality. Procedia Computer Science. 186, 344-351 https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCS.2021.04.155
Malinowski, M. (2006). El cuestionario como instrumento diagnóstico: las hipótesis intermedias. Subjetividad y procesos cognitivos, 8, 204-232. http://dspace.uces.edu.ar:8180/jspui/handle/123456789/757
Miranda Beltrán, S., & Ortiz Bernal, J. A. (2020). Los paradigmas de la investigación: un acercamiento teórico para reflexionar desde el campo de la investigación educativa. RIDE Revista Iberoamericana Para La Investigación Y El Desarrollo Educativo, 11(21). https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v11i21.717
Moreno, C. E. V. (2008). Metodología de la investigación y manejo de la información. Fiscalía General de la Nación.
Moura, F. T. (2023). Artificial Intelligence, Creativity, and Intentionality: The Need for a Paradigm Shift. Journal of Creative Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.585
Nautiyal, R., Jha, R., Kathuria, S., Chanti, Y., Rathor, N., & Gupta, M. (2023). Intersection of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Entertainment Sector. 2023 4th International Conference on Smart Electronics and Communication (ICOSEC), 1273-1278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOSEC58147.2023.10275976
Oviedo, H. C., y Campo Arias, A. (2005). Aproximación al uso del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría, 34(4), 572-580. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-74502005000400009&lng=en&tlng=es
Pedreschi, D., Dignum, F., Morini, V., Pansanella, V., & Cornacchia, G. (2023). Towards a social artificial intelligence. In M. Chetouani, V. Dignum, P. Lukowicz, & C. Sierra (Eds.), Human-centered artificial intelligence. ACAI 2021. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 13500). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-24349-3_21#citeas
Prins, M. (2022, March 1). Improving content discovery and viewer engagement with AI. Mile-High Video Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/3510450.3517308
Quraishi, F. F., Wajid, S. A., & Dhiman, P. (2017). Social and Ethical Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Public - A Case Study of University Students. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET1738154
Rodríguez, M. E. (2024). El arkhé del transparadigma complejo. Griot: Revista De Filosofia, 24(2), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.31977/grirfi.v24i2.4792
Romero, M. del C., y Álvarez, M. B. (2022). Usos del término "Likert". Una revisión en estudios sobre aprendizaje organizacional. Revista De La Escuela De Perfeccionamiento En Investigación Operativa, 30(51), 41-57. https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/epio/article/view/37820
Ruiz-Bueno, A. (2008). La mostra: alguns elements per a la seva confecció. REIRE Revista d’Innovació I Recerca En Educació, 1(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1344/reire2008.1.1117
Sanabria-Navarro, J., Silveira-Pérez, Y., Pérez-Bravo, D., y de-Jesús-Cortina-Núñez, M. (2023). Incidences of artificial intelligence in contemporary education. [Incidencias de la inteligencia artificial en la educación contemporánea]. Comunicar, 77(31), 97-107. https://doi.org/10.3916/C77-2023-08
Sankaran, S., & Markopoulos, P. (2021). "It's like a puppet master": User perceptions of personal autonomy when interacting with intelligent technologies. Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450613.3456820
Sethi, K., Sharma, A., Chauhan, S., & Jaiswal, V. (2020). Impact of Social and Cultural Challenges in Education Using AI. In M. Habib (Ed.), Revolutionizing Education in the Age of AI and Machine Learning (pp. 130-151). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7793-5.ch007
Tejeda, J. (1997). El proceso de investigación científica. Barcelona: Fundación “La Caixa”.
Troncoso Parady, G., Katayama, G., Yamazaki, H., Yamanami, T., Takami, K., & Harata, N. (2019). Analysis of social networks, social interactions, and out-of-home leisure activity generation: Evidence from Japan. Transportation, 46, 537-562. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11116-018-9873-8
Vasco-González, M., Goig Martínez, R. M., & Úbeda-Sánchez, Á. M. (2020). Experiencias digitales, riesgos y enfoque educativo del ocio digital con jóvenes en dificultad social. Texto Livre: Linguagem e Tecnología, 13(3), 294.315. https://doi.org/10.35699/1983-3652.2020.26132
Williams, R. (2022). Constructionism, ethics, and creativity: Developing tools for the future of education with AI. 2022 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1109/VL/HCC53370.2022.9832963
Xie, C., Ruan, M., Lin, P., Wang, Z., Lai, T., Xie, Y., Fu, S., & Lu, H. (2022). Influence of Artificial Intelligence in Education on Adolescents’ Social Adaptability: A Machine Learning Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), 7890. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137890
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Ricardo Alberto Reza Flores, Citlali Michélle Reza Flores, Alejandra Zamudio Palomar